Executive Decision Brief
Written for NDIA reviewers and AAT members, not for coordinators. Makes the decision-maker's job easy.
Your NDIA Submissions.
Done Right. Done Fast.
A single weak submission can cost a participant $30,000–$80,000 in lost funding. Not because the need isn't there — because the argument wasn't made properly. We fix that.
✓ ABN Verified
✓ NDIS Act 2013
✓ 561 AAT Decisions Analysed
561
AAT & ART decisions analysed
40
Compliance checks on every document
3–5 days
Standard turnaround
The document most coordinators dread writing
Support Coordinators are not document lawyers. But the NDIA treats submissions like they are. Every support request must map to one of the six criteria under Section 34(1) of the NDIS Act — and if it doesn't, participants lose funding.
Not because they don't qualify. Because the argument wasn't made.
What's at stake
$30,000 – $80,000
average annual funding unlocked by a well-constructed submission
Most coordinators leave 20–40% of eligible funding on the table through incomplete documentation.
How It Works
From your notes to a lodgement-ready submission in 3–5 business days.
-
You tell us what you need
Fill in our guided intake (8 questions, 5 minutes)
-
We build the case
Our AI drafter, Marco, prepares all five documents from your evidence
-
Sarek runs 40 checks
Every document passes through 40 binary compliance checks before you see it
-
You receive a ready-to-lodge submission
Structured, de-identified, reviewed by Scott, re-identified and delivered securely
Five Documents. One Complete Submission.
Full Submission Document
Comprehensive functional impact statement mapped to every Section 34(1) criterion.
Support Justification Table
6-column table pre-empting every standard NDIA objection.
Indicative Budget
Funding category breakdown aligned to the current NDIS Pricing Arrangements.
Personal Health & Treatment Plan
Bridges clinical language to NDIS support requirements where medical evidence is present.
Tell us what you need
8 questions. 5 minutes. We'll have a quote to you within 4 business hours.
Step 1 of 8
Transparent Pricing
Every engagement is quoted individually after intake. These ranges reflect typical complexity.
Entry
$1,500–$2,500
Best for single support category with clear evidence
- EDB + Full Submission Document
- 3–5 business days
- ✓ 40 Sarek checks
- ✓ Scott review
Most Common
Core
$3,500–$5,500
Multiple categories, mixed evidence
- All 5 documents
- 3–5 business days
- ✓ 40 Sarek checks
- ✓ Scott review
Complex
$6,000–$9,500
AAT review, complex disability, disputed decisions
- All 5 documents + advocacy brief
- 5–7 business days
- ✓ 40 Sarek checks
- ✓ Scott — priority review
SC Retainer available for coordinators with ongoing volume — contact us for rates.
Common Questions
Marco (AI drafter) prepares the initial structure from your intake data and evidence. Every document then passes 40 binary compliance checks through our Sarek system. Scott Feeney reviews and approves every document before delivery. Your name is never on work you haven't seen.
No. We prepare documents. We do not provide legal advice, represent participants, or appear at AAT hearings. See our full scope statement.
All participant data is de-identified before entering our system. A unique token replaces the participant's name, DOB, and NDIS number. Re-identification happens only at delivery, by Scott, on a system never connected to the drafting environment.
We don't guarantee outcomes — no one ethically can. We guarantee the document meets every structural and legislative requirement for a Section 34 submission. If NDIA rejects on grounds related to our document quality, we'll review at no charge.
Currently we work exclusively with Support Coordinators and LACs. Participants engage us through their coordinator.
A monthly arrangement for coordinators with regular volume. Fixed monthly fee, priority turnaround, reduced per-document rate. Contact us for pricing.